Once again, the Danish Government has applied for devaluation without putting forward even a single proposal for economic reform.

It was tabled according to the rules.

the application was lodged in

A civil action was brought from 1998.

The request was not submitted in time.

Risk Management Plan Risk Management Plan was not submitted.

A dose confirmation study was submitted with the response.

(Parliament rejected draft Amendment No 62)

They would be certain to vote against the budget.

I am therefore interpreting the Rules of Procedure perfectly correctly.

Another reason we shall be voting in favour of the motion is that it provides the workers, who will shortly be renegotiating their contracts, with a fairly important point of reference.

I shall now turn to the amendment that has been tabled.

The dissertation was completed in 1892 and printed in 1893.

The report was submitted on 20th February 1997.

We would be bringing the whole matter up again, and we should then need 206 votes for the adoption of the budget.

each draft amendment and each proposed modification, each section of the draft budget, the draft budget as a whole . . .

I now turn to Mr Arndt, who said that a qualified majority was necessary for the vote on the budget as a whole.

No one, a priori, has the right to blame Members for the way they vote.

President. Mr Bonde, that is a different point from the one raised by Mr de la Malène we shall come back to it later.

It proved satisfactory then and is likely to form the basis of real stability in the future.

I have had a case described to me where the same paperwork was submitted on three separate occasions, but the Commission still maintained that it had never received this paperwork.

The Application was submitted to Germany as a Concerned Member State.

The Application was submitted to Germany as a CMS.

President. On Item 3363, I have draft Amendment No 20 rev.

President. On Item 3932, I have draft Amend ments Nos 77 and 32.

(Parliament adoped draft Amendment No 72)

President. I call Mrs Salisch on a point of order.

Moreover, the groups wish to give explanations of vote, and to do that there has to be a vote on the matter as a whole.

President.

President.

This directive can undoubtedly play a part in preventing handicaps caused by accidents at work.

Mr Sherlock. Mr President and colleagues, firstly I must commended the opinions of the Committee on

A number of amendments have been submitted to my report.

This resolution was submitted on 20 June 2002.

The petition was filed by Dr. Jonas J. Jarvis,

an application for the aid must have been properly submitted to the competent authority concerned

The Czechoslovak patent was filed 1966 by Petráň and Milan Hadravský, a Czechoslovak coworker.

In case of problem with a LP or LV, complaints can be submitted to the KAN.

The case was settled out of court.

But I believe that things could be done far more effectively, while respecting everyone's views and cultural differences, if there were closer cooperation in a number of practical areas.

On Article 874, I have draft Amendment No 45.

We must therefore ask what significance a vote on the budget as a whole would have.

Lord Harmar Nicholls. Madam President, there is a conflict on the legality of the situation.

If it does not, we shall certainly have to come back to it in a second reading.

Mr Dankert, rapporteur. (NL) Madam President, what I have to say relates not to the Rules of Procedure but solely to the implications of this vote with regard to the Treaty.