Redress

If correction or rectification is denied or restricted, the requested Competent Authority will, without undue delay, provide to the individual, or to his or to her duly authorised representative as set forth in paragraph 3, a response setting forth the basis for the denial or restriction of correction or rectification.

Notice of the procedure for seeking any further administrative redress shall be as provided for in Article 20.

CHAPTER V REMEDIES

Section 1 Remedies

Article 4 Right of appeal

Article 48 Appeal

Article 53 Right to apply to the courts

Article 8 Appeal

Enquiries and contact points

Review and appeal

4.28 Article 65 Appeal

Article 18 Administrative Redress

Article 19 Judicial Redress

Article 26 Courts of appeal and means of contest

Article 39 Courts of appeal and means of contest

4.3 Review and appeal (suspending execution of decisions)

Article 7 Consultation and legal remedy

the Tribunal de Comarca ,

the käräjäoikeus tingsrätt ,

Transit strengthened non discrimination

Appeal against the decision O

Did the creditor lodge the challenge?

In the circumstances, the Committee is of the view that the author was denied effective remedy within the meaning of article 6 of the Convention in connection with article 2 (d).

Contest of the appeal decision

in Norway an appeal to the Høyesterett , .

the Svea hovrätt ,

Service of the document instituting the challenge.

If the party against whom enforcement is sought fails to appear before the appellate court in proceedings concerning an appeal brought by the applicant, Article 26(2) to (4) shall apply even where the party against whom enforcement is sought is not domiciled in any of the States bound by this Convention.

Articles 23 and 24 Appeal and Conciliation Procedure

in respect of judgments ordering a performance other than the payment of a sum of money, the juge cantonal d'exequatur compétent zuständiger kantonaler Vollstreckungsrichter giudice cantonale competente a pronunciare l'exequatur,

(BORDER AGENCY COOPERATION)

4.3.6 The EESC would, however, be in favour of a supranational review procedure that is generally more harmonised in civil and commercial proceedings, provided that the defendant has the safeguard of an a posteriori means of redress (special review).

4.3.6 The EESC would, however, be in favour of a supranational review procedure that is generally more harmonised in civil and commercial proceedings, provided that the defendant has the safeguard of an a posteriori means of redress (special review).

10.2 CETA draft contains no appeals system.

Article 29 Contest of the appeal decision

An appeal to the Administrative Tribunal shall only be admissible if

in Lithuania, an appeal to the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas ,

in Lithuania, an appeal to the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas ,

Active substance

active substance

provisions

Active substance

Animal Species

Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial