(0.61, 1.73)

Statistically significant

In the two studies, risperidone 0.02 to 0.06 mg kg day was significantly superior to placebo on the pre specified primary endpoint, i. e., the change from baseline in the Conduct Problem subscale of the Nisonger Child Behaviour Rating Form (N CBRF) at Week 6.

significant (level 1)

Efavirenz significantly decreases voriconazole plasma concentrations while voriconazole also significantly increases efavirenz plasma concentrations.

ori (43 as compared with 28 ).

66 Scale (YMRS) score at Week 3.

The percentage of patients with an asthma attack (an asthma attack being defined as a period of worsening asthma that required treatment with oral steroids, an unscheduled visit to the doctor s office, an emergency room visit, or hospitalization) was 32.2 in the montelukast group and 25.6 in the fluticasone group the odds ratio (95 CI) being significant equal to 1.38 (1.04, 1.84).

Enbrel was significantly better than placebo in all components of the ACR criteria as well as other measures of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity not included in the ACR response criteria, such as morning stiffness.

Patients with Clinically Significant Response ( )

Among patients treated with celecoxib 200 mg BID, 48 were considered unresponsive to lisinopril at the final clinic visit (defined as either cuff diastolic blood pressure 90 mmHg or cuff diastolic blood pressure increased 10 compared to baseline), compared to 27 of patients treated with placebo this difference was statistically significant.

Cmax was not significantly changed.

Kawasaki disease was reported in 5 of 36,150 vaccine recipients ( 0.1 ) and 1 of 35,536 placebo recipients ( 0.1 ) with a relative risk (RR) of 4.9 95 CI, 0.6 239.1 (not statistically significant).

They're not statistically significant.

The latter story is now particularly significant.

This difference was not statistically significant.

1.9 for placebo) of serum potassium concentration ( 6.0 mmol l), although this was not statistically significant.

Ventavis was significantly more effective than placebo

The difference was not statistically significant

Treatment with pravastatin significantly reduced

Those are a small sample of some fractal like objects in nature.

That's more, you know, sad than significant.

Risk positions are to be significantly reduced.

All comparisons against placebo were statistically significant.

The differences observed were not clinically significant.

The other findings are not toxicologically significant.

This difference was statistically significant (p 0.001).

products (dose in mg)

The ORR was significantly higher (80 vs.

12), but this was not statistically significant.

The incidence of patient discontinuations due to oedema was 0.9 for etoricoxib versus 0.7 for diclofenac.

glucuronidation

Lansoprazole is not significantly eliminated by haemodialysis.

Risk positions are to be reduced significantly.

We have significantly lower capital costs in our plant equipment.

The majority of endpoint events were diagnosed by a prescheduled venography and consisted mainly of distal DVT, but the incidence of proximal DVT was also significantly reduced.

Overall survival was also significantly longer (p 0.0201) in favor of the TCF arm with a risk reduction of mortality of 22.7 .

Total body BMD also increased significantly.

This change is not thought to be clinically significant.

This difference between treatment arms was statistically significant.

Serum calcium is not significantly altered by somatropin.

The effect was significant from the first year.

ut but the incidence of proximal DVT was also significantly reduced.

The majority of endpoint events were diagnosed by a prescheduled venography and consisted mainly of distal DVT, ng but the incidence of proximal DVT was also significantly reduced.

Concentrations of atazanavir were not significantly affected.